TEALE FENNING Forum Index TEALE FENNING
Medical Education
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Research methodology

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TEALE FENNING Forum Index -> MRCOG Part 2: EMQs - Extended Matching Questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Xerxes I
Century Club


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 219
Location: Winchester

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:01 pm    Post subject: Research methodology Reply with quote

This is from RCOG book on EMQs (by Duthie and Hodges) and the reason I am posting it, is that I don't agree with the answer they have given. See what you think:


Options:
A: 125.00
B: 100.00
C: 90.40
D: 90.00
E: 83.00
F: 81.00
G: 80.00
H: 79.00
I: 77.00
J: 16.88
K: 15.46
L: 13.39
M: 5.00
N: 2.50

In a prospective blind study of a possible new method of antenatal fetal screening for a particular disorder, 5000 pregnant women rated as having a high risk for babies wih this disorder were recruited and tested. These were the results:


----------------------- Born with Disorder --- Born without disorder---total
Tested Positive----- 200---------------------475---------------------------675
Tested negative-----50----------------------4275--------------------------4325

Totals--------------250-----------------4750---------------------5000


for each item below, choose the single most appropriate figure (rounded by two decimal points) from the above list. Each option may be used once, more than once, or not at all.

Item1:
The percentage chance of a woman with a positive screening test having a child affected by the disorder.

Item2:
The positive predictive value.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rpeevor



Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

we covered this Q 6/12 ago.. it is completely wrong - the answers are wrong both in the numbers and explanations.. just ignore it and move on...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1742
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But the newcomers may not be aware so it is important as errors like this throw you and sometimes take you even longer to realise / work out why they are wrong!
_________________
"Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Xerxes I
Century Club


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 219
Location: Winchester

PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is not an EMQ but I thought maybe an exercise in basic stat calculation would be nice.

I have taken this from the college guideline on Placenta praevia.

Chou et al. prospectively followed 80 women with persistent placenta praevia using transabdominal B-mode and colour Doppler ultrasonography, with 17 cases of accreta identified at delivery. Doppler imaging identified 16 cases of suspected accreta, of which 14 were correct with two false positives, and it failed to diagnose the three other cases of accreta, giving a sensitivity of ..... and a specificity of .......The positive and negative predictive values were ......and ....., respectively.

You can check your results by clicking here . page 3 near the end of the page.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TEALE FENNING Forum Index -> MRCOG Part 2: EMQs - Extended Matching Questions All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group