| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wolverine Century Club
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 393
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:51 pm Post subject: RCOG part 2 revision course |
|
|
| Has anybody been to that course? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1742 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It sounds as if you have been according to one of your other posts? _________________ "Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wolverine Century Club
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 393
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes I did. It was generally helpful but not very cost effective! NICE quidelines would not recommend it, I'm sure! I got a bit worried though about how the essays are marked in the exams and how acurate and fare is the mark you get |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1742 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you elaborate?
I can guess what theyt told you!
I must admit I have been slowly changing the advice we give on the Essay Course to address the issue of subjective marking in the Essays. Let's face it whenever a human is involved the marking is open to interpretation. That is why they introduced EMQs. The original aim was to change the whole Part II to EMQs but I think this has been put on hold. They need a few years at least to see how everyone performs.
Anyway, following the Dubai Course and marking the essays from the Essay Writing Technique Course I realised that despite all the good advice we give you people are still not translating their knowledge and our suggestions into high quality = high scoring essays.
Take home message - write less and get to the point. Do not try and write extensive, wordy essays. Take each point and justify your actions.
Most importantly, especially with the new style Essays where you have a specific and limited space in which to write and score, you have to realy study the question and the way it has been split up to ensure you address what the College want and that you get the right stuff in the right place. Not an easy task as the Sept guys will tell you!
I think we hav this sorted already however and the team on this weeks ABC Course will agree I hope. I think we all agreed that you need to paln even more now and think very very carefully before putting pen to paper.
Bubbling has become essential ... not that it ever wasn't
I will be showing how to do this on next weekends Essay Practice Course - our last course before the exam. We have written 36 new essays in the new format and provide some hot topic predictions. Plenty of spaces if anyone is interested. _________________ "Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wolverine Century Club
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 393
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, we did some mock essays (which were ALL with the previous format!!!!!!!! but anyway..) and the marking was done by the examiners who are going to be examining in March/May. In one of them I got a realy low score (3/20) and when we discussed about it I realised that I have included at least 80% of the points that they were scoring! I asked for a second opinion from another examiner and he kindly apologised and corrected to "at least 13". Is there any back up or I'm totally depending on the mood that the examiner is going to be on that particular time that he gets my paper in his hands? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1742 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only back up is a formal complaint and a request for a remark.
You will not need to do this anyway my friend as you are a guaranteed pass
One question I would aks, and one you should have asked yourself, is why did he score you so low in the first instance? Was it just bad marking or were some of your marks not so easy to see / find?
We go on and on about impressing the person marking your paper. The old style introduction was a great way to do this but sadly this opportunity has now gone from the vast majority of essays although it still worked well for the fibroid one where you were asked 'what would affect your management'.
My advice:
1. Keep it all very simple
2. Be direct
3. Read the question and make surte you undestand it
4. Answer the question (and I mean this sincerely as many people read and understand the question and yet still chose to write about what they want)
5. Go for simple, everyday facts that modify what you do in real life
6. Always think about the question as a real clinical setting and ask yourself what you would do and why
7. Justify every single comment you make - say how and why you do the thing you do
 _________________ "Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1742 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wolverine wrote: | | Well, we did some mock essays (which were ALL with the previous format!!!!!!!! but anyway..) |
Very disappointing.
From what we have heard very few courses have set essays using the new style format.
We did, as you know, and I think this is important as one of the most common concerns we heard from the September group was of uncertainty of what to write in each section. Unless you are forced to write in a confined space and made to chose what info goes where you are not really doing a mock exam which, after all and by definiton (hence the word "mock"), should reflect the exam you are going to sit!
I can confirm that all of the essays in next weekends Essay Practice Course are in the new format. We will not be giving out lined essay books however as the weekend is spent planning essays rather than writing them. That is how we get through so many. _________________ "Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wolverine Century Club
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 393
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you for your good words and support Nick. I seriously found your course and your input with this forum far more useful! I was so jealous with Abi and Raj who are coming to the course this weekend! I'm on call next weekend (..and my budget is zero) but I'll might swap and make it to London for the essay practice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wolverine Century Club
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 393
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't go to ask him personally for his marking because I would have said something very rude!!
The other examiner spent about 2 minutes to have a good look on my paper so I believe that the points were not that hidden! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1742 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wolverine wrote: | | The other examiner spent about 2 minutes to have a good look on my paper so I believe that the points were not that hidden! |
A good look in 2 minutes
One would expect a little more than that considering all the hard work and sacrifices, not to mention the money, you have put into this!
I guess we spend a minimum of 10 minutes reading and marking an individual essay and another 10-20 making constructive comments and providing direction. I hope that was readily apparent in the marked essays from the Essay Writing Technique mock exam. _________________ "Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|