| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mrcog2010
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the following are associated with 'spontaneous' preterm delivery:
breech F
uterine abnormality T
diabetes T
twins T
CAN WE DISCUSS PLZ ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1854 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rpwalavalkar wrote: | | Quote: | the following are associated with 'spontaneous' preterm delivery:
breech
uterine abnormality
diabetes
twins |
Uterine abnormality -- True
when associated with cervical incompetence and in bicornuate uterus.
Diabetes -- True
contributing factors - macrosomia, polyhydramnios
Twins -- true
Known association
Breech -- unsure. my first thought was false.
r |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrcog2010
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks nick |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maud
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 73 Location: Bristol
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I said true for breech, as breech is more common in prematurity and therefore also in premature labour.
I said false with diabetes, cause thought prematurity was more common because of iatrogenic causes (e/l section or induction). I did consider saying true because of polyhydramnios, but wasn't sure whether that was a "second cousin".
This is why I hate mcq's, there's no chance to explain your thought process and having it wrong gives you as little points as someone who is just guessing it wrong  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrcog2010
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I Think there is a differance between preterm and premature |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1854 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Breech
False - not spontaneous.
The relationship with preterm delivery is different - if you deliver prematurely the presentation is more likely to be breech but breech, per se, does not predispose to preterm delivery.
uterine abnormality
True - clear but often debated relationship. The RCOG do say anomalies are related to cervical incompetence but I am less sure. The relationship persists even for minor defects such as an arcuate uterus.
diabetes
False - poorly controlled may lead to polyhydramnios and then spontaneous PTL but not diabetes alone hence the need for induction in so many cases.
twins
True - straightforward and proportionate to the 'n' i.e. higher with triplets and so on. Also higher for monoamniotic twins I believe as the incidence of TTS is increased. I wonder what proportion of preterm triplets are spontaneous and iatrogenic? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1854 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mrcog2010 wrote: | | I Think there is a differance between preterm and premature |
I do not think so mrcog2010 - they are synonymous in my opinion. Both refer to birth before the 37th completed week.
We can further subdivide into very preterm and extreme prematurity as we do with birthweight:
Birthweight
- LBW < 2500g
- VLBW <1500g
- XLBW < 1000g
These weights roughly equate with birth at or below 37 weeks, 32 weeks, and 28 weeks respectively (at least I think so - I am recalling this from my 6 months elective in neonates).
Not sure I have ever seen a subdivision of PTL but that would be my suggestion.
Remember gestational age is a more important predictor of outcome than birthweight (Epicure study). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|