TEALE FENNING Forum Index TEALE FENNING
Medical Education
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Monozygotic twins
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TEALE FENNING Forum Index -> MRCOG Part 2: MCQ & Past Paper questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mridulaben
Century Club


Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 137
Location: Brunei

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:28 am    Post subject: Monozygotic twins Reply with quote

Situs invertus occurs more commonly than in general population
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wolverine
Century Club


Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 393

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My understanding is that situs inversus or loss of organ orientation and symmetry is a rare autosomal recessive condition and can be part of primary cilliary dyskinesia or Kartagener syndrome. Has no racial predilection, male to female is 1:1 and therefore it's not more common in monozygotic twins. Although I was itching to say true as MC twins could be associated with all the abnormalities of this world! Although there are reports of one of the monozygotic twins with situs inversus which mean that it is not only genetically determined.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rpwalavalkar
Teale Fenning Administrator


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 946

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TRUE

Some monozygotic twins are known as "mirror twins" or mirror image twins. These are identical twins with opposite features, that is, one may be right-handed and the other left, mirrored hair curls, etc. This condition is comparatively rare in humans: about 25% of all identical twins are mirrored. It results from a late split of the fertilized egg at around 9-12 days. One mirror may have situs inversus, where some or all of the organs are on the opposite side of the body, such as the left ventricle of the heart on the right (dextrocardia). Such conditions are usually associated with a higher incidence of other birth defects.

ref-- Wenk RE, Houtz T, Brooks M, Chiafari FA (1992). "How frequent is heteropaternal superfecundation?". Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae 41 (1): 43-7. PMID 1488855
_________________
Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1773
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also thought this was true - not sure why but have seen the two words / phrases in association lots of times - enough, in fact, to make a MCQ true Wink
_________________
"Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
EMAK
Century Club


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 570

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I couldn't find it but I think True.

Last edited by EMAK on Fri May 16, 2008 10:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jilly



Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject: incidence of twins Reply with quote

another MCQ;
In relation to monozygotic twins, the incidence is approx 25% of all twin pregnancies?

I have figures of 1 in 100 for twins in the UK and 3 in 1000 for monozygotic twins - making MZ twins about 1/3rd of all twins - which is about 25%??? Do anyone else have any figures?

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SallyC



Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 50
Location: Oxford

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The figures I have are;
Twins 15:1000
MZ twins 3.5:1000
This would indeed make them 25% of all twin pregnancies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xerxes I
Century Club


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 226
Location: Winchester

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agree with Sally. 15 in 1000 is a more recent figure (1997?), used to be 1% in mid 80s.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rpwalavalkar
Teale Fenning Administrator


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 946

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hi guys,

this is from the RCOG HFEA consultation document of june 07

In UK the incidence of twins has risen from 9.0 per 1000 births in 1985 to 14.2 per 1000 births in 2000 and the incidence of triplets has quadrupled in the same time period (Office of national statistics series DH3, No 32, London 2000).

In 2001, 145 in every 10,000 maternities resulted in the birth of twins, while 4 in every 10,000 maternities led to triplets or more. The rates are higher for older women -among women aged over 40, twins accounted for 194 in every 10,000 maternities, and triplets for 11 in every 10,000 maternities.

for women aged under 20, twins accounted for 61 in every 10,000 maternities and triplets for less than 1 in every 10,000 maternities

ref -- Department of Health, statistics and surveys 2001. Available from: http://www.doh.gov.uk/public/statlink.htm


so 15 per 1000 is a right figure to quote.

r
_________________
Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nibbs07



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Location: Hampshire

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

few more MCQs regarding multiple pregnancy-

timing of separation is usually >14 days
structural defects are usually concordant
upto 20% of twins diagnosed in 1st trimester proceed only as singletons

Smile
_________________
Nibbs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1773
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:

With regard to twin pregnancy:

1. the miscarriage rate is twice that of singletons

2. the risk of early miscarriage is 40%

3. the risk of late miscarriage (12-24 weeks) is 12%

4. the incidence of preterm delivery is 22%

5. the incidence of early preterm delivery (before 32 weeks) is four times that for singleton pregnancies

6. they have twice the chance of being SGA

7. are associated with a caesarean section rate of 40% or more

8. risks are higher for IVF twins than for spontaneously conceived twins

9. have a higher indicence of stillbirth even if normally grown

10. have a stillbirth rate comparable to that seen in high risk mothers

11. have a much higher rate of RDS for comparable gestational ages

12. have a 6% chance of congenital abnormality for each twin

That will keep you busy! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
nibbs07



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Location: Hampshire

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 7:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ummm very informative

Thanks Nick

Nibbs
_________________
Nibbs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
salihabduallah



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 100

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most of them seems true as multiple pregnancy particularly after IVF carries high incidence of almost all obstetrical complications.
BUT : Percentage >> dificult to conclude.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
rpwalavalkar
Teale Fenning Administrator


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 946

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick,

please end the suspense, where will i get this twin preg data?

r
_________________
Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cpeedahsa
Century Club


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 792

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick Raine-Fenning wrote:
Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:

With regard to twin pregnancy:

1. the miscarriage rate is twice that of singletons



True

Miscarriage rate in
Singleton pregnancy- 7.7%

Multiple pregnancy (twins, triplets)- 18.0%
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cpeedahsa
Century Club


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 792

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick Raine-Fenning wrote:
Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:

With regard to twin pregnancy:

4. the incidence of preterm delivery is 22%



False

incidence of preterm delivery is arround 50% in twins
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cpeedahsa
Century Club


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 792

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick Raine-Fenning wrote:
Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:

With regard to twin pregnancy:


8. risks are higher for IVF twins than for spontaneously conceived twins



False
Recent case-controlled, retrospective observations from different ART registries have suggested that early twin gestations have an improved rate of survival compared with singletons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cpeedahsa
Century Club


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 792

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick Raine-Fenning wrote:
Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:

With regard to twin pregnancy:

7. are associated with a caesarean section rate of 40% or more



True
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1773
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

100% so far Asha!

The figures are quite scary aren't they!

Let's try and go through the whole lot as you will then have a nice set of facts to help formulate an essay on single embryo transfer and the risks of multiple pregancy which is as hot a topic as you could get! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
cpeedahsa
Century Club


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 792

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Nick for these teasers,
The actual figures are indeed very scary.
Starting a fellowship in genetics in July ... and in the process of relocating...to Boston
I will get back with the rest soon.

a
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TEALE FENNING Forum Index -> MRCOG Part 2: MCQ & Past Paper questions All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group