| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mridulaben Century Club
Joined: 08 Nov 2006 Posts: 137 Location: Brunei
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:28 am Post subject: Monozygotic twins |
|
|
| Situs invertus occurs more commonly than in general population |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wolverine Century Club
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 393
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| My understanding is that situs inversus or loss of organ orientation and symmetry is a rare autosomal recessive condition and can be part of primary cilliary dyskinesia or Kartagener syndrome. Has no racial predilection, male to female is 1:1 and therefore it's not more common in monozygotic twins. Although I was itching to say true as MC twins could be associated with all the abnormalities of this world! Although there are reports of one of the monozygotic twins with situs inversus which mean that it is not only genetically determined. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rpwalavalkar Teale Fenning Administrator
Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 946
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TRUE
Some monozygotic twins are known as "mirror twins" or mirror image twins. These are identical twins with opposite features, that is, one may be right-handed and the other left, mirrored hair curls, etc. This condition is comparatively rare in humans: about 25% of all identical twins are mirrored. It results from a late split of the fertilized egg at around 9-12 days. One mirror may have situs inversus, where some or all of the organs are on the opposite side of the body, such as the left ventricle of the heart on the right (dextrocardia). Such conditions are usually associated with a higher incidence of other birth defects.
ref-- Wenk RE, Houtz T, Brooks M, Chiafari FA (1992). "How frequent is heteropaternal superfecundation?". Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae 41 (1): 43-7. PMID 1488855 _________________ Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1773 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also thought this was true - not sure why but have seen the two words / phrases in association lots of times - enough, in fact, to make a MCQ true  _________________ "Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EMAK Century Club
Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 570
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I couldn't find it but I think True.
Last edited by EMAK on Fri May 16, 2008 10:21 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jilly
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: incidence of twins |
|
|
another MCQ;
In relation to monozygotic twins, the incidence is approx 25% of all twin pregnancies?
I have figures of 1 in 100 for twins in the UK and 3 in 1000 for monozygotic twins - making MZ twins about 1/3rd of all twins - which is about 25%??? Do anyone else have any figures?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SallyC
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Posts: 50 Location: Oxford
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The figures I have are;
Twins 15:1000
MZ twins 3.5:1000
This would indeed make them 25% of all twin pregnancies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xerxes I Century Club
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 226 Location: Winchester
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Agree with Sally. 15 in 1000 is a more recent figure (1997?), used to be 1% in mid 80s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rpwalavalkar Teale Fenning Administrator
Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 946
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
hi guys,
this is from the RCOG HFEA consultation document of june 07
In UK the incidence of twins has risen from 9.0 per 1000 births in 1985 to 14.2 per 1000 births in 2000 and the incidence of triplets has quadrupled in the same time period (Office of national statistics series DH3, No 32, London 2000).
In 2001, 145 in every 10,000 maternities resulted in the birth of twins, while 4 in every 10,000 maternities led to triplets or more. The rates are higher for older women -among women aged over 40, twins accounted for 194 in every 10,000 maternities, and triplets for 11 in every 10,000 maternities.
for women aged under 20, twins accounted for 61 in every 10,000 maternities and triplets for less than 1 in every 10,000 maternities
ref -- Department of Health, statistics and surveys 2001. Available from: http://www.doh.gov.uk/public/statlink.htm
so 15 per 1000 is a right figure to quote.
r _________________ Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nibbs07
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 9 Location: Hampshire
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
few more MCQs regarding multiple pregnancy-
timing of separation is usually >14 days
structural defects are usually concordant
upto 20% of twins diagnosed in 1st trimester proceed only as singletons
 _________________ Nibbs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1773 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:
With regard to twin pregnancy:
1. the miscarriage rate is twice that of singletons
2. the risk of early miscarriage is 40%
3. the risk of late miscarriage (12-24 weeks) is 12%
4. the incidence of preterm delivery is 22%
5. the incidence of early preterm delivery (before 32 weeks) is four times that for singleton pregnancies
6. they have twice the chance of being SGA
7. are associated with a caesarean section rate of 40% or more
8. risks are higher for IVF twins than for spontaneously conceived twins
9. have a higher indicence of stillbirth even if normally grown
10. have a stillbirth rate comparable to that seen in high risk mothers
11. have a much higher rate of RDS for comparable gestational ages
12. have a 6% chance of congenital abnormality for each twin
That will keep you busy!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nibbs07
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 9 Location: Hampshire
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ummm very informative
Thanks Nick
Nibbs _________________ Nibbs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
salihabduallah
Joined: 04 Sep 2007 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Most of them seems true as multiple pregnancy particularly after IVF carries high incidence of almost all obstetrical complications.
BUT : Percentage >> dificult to conclude. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rpwalavalkar Teale Fenning Administrator
Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 946
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nick,
please end the suspense, where will i get this twin preg data?
r _________________ Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cpeedahsa Century Club
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 792
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nick Raine-Fenning wrote: | Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:
With regard to twin pregnancy:
1. the miscarriage rate is twice that of singletons
|
True
Miscarriage rate in
Singleton pregnancy- 7.7%
Multiple pregnancy (twins, triplets)- 18.0% |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cpeedahsa Century Club
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 792
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nick Raine-Fenning wrote: | Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:
With regard to twin pregnancy:
4. the incidence of preterm delivery is 22%
|
False
incidence of preterm delivery is arround 50% in twins |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cpeedahsa Century Club
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 792
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nick Raine-Fenning wrote: | Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:
With regard to twin pregnancy:
8. risks are higher for IVF twins than for spontaneously conceived twins
|
False
Recent case-controlled, retrospective observations from different ART registries have suggested that early twin gestations have an improved rate of survival compared with singletons. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cpeedahsa Century Club
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 792
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nick Raine-Fenning wrote: | Can I add some as well? These are very important to us in an IVF unit especially with the big drive for single embryo transfer (SET). So:
With regard to twin pregnancy:
7. are associated with a caesarean section rate of 40% or more
|
True |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Raine-Fenning Course Director
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1773 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
100% so far Asha!
The figures are quite scary aren't they!
Let's try and go through the whole lot as you will then have a nice set of facts to help formulate an essay on single embryo transfer and the risks of multiple pregancy which is as hot a topic as you could get!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cpeedahsa Century Club
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 792
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Nick for these teasers,
The actual figures are indeed very scary.
Starting a fellowship in genetics in July ... and in the process of relocating...to Boston
I will get back with the rest soon.
a |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|