TEALE FENNING Forum Index TEALE FENNING
Medical Education
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Epilepsy

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TEALE FENNING Forum Index -> MRCOG Part 2: MCQ & Past Paper questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
EMAK
Century Club


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 572

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:12 pm    Post subject: Epilepsy Reply with quote

If the mother had Epilepsy before but now the disease is controlled withoud drug ,ie there is no risk of ADEs, Is the risk of fetal malformation still higher than general population or the same?! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1862
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still higher ? double.

It is also higher if the father is epileptic similar to diabetes.

The child also has an increased risk of epilepsy which increases when both parents are affected.

Suggests a genetic predisposition.
_________________
"Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
EMAK
Century Club


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 572

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As you open the subject of DM,,, I was thinking that well controlled IDDM are not associated with miscarriage or IUD.....as it is well controlled,,, but now I think it is simillar to epilepsy as you say,, even if controlled, may still cary higher risk of fetal complication....am I right?! Exclamation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1862
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EMAK wrote:
As you open the subject of DM,,, I was thinking that well controlled IDDM are not associated with miscarriage or IUD.....as it is well controlled,,, but now I think it is simillar to epilepsy as you say,, even if controlled, may still cary higher risk of fetal complication....am I right?! Exclamation


You are right.

We have discussed this before - see this thread
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rpwalavalkar
Teale Fenning Administrator


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 973

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hi,

found this on the epilepsy foundation web site..........

GENERAL POPULATION

MAJOR MALFORMATIONS 2 to 3 Percent
MINOR MALFORMATIONS 5 to 10 Percent
FETAL DEATH 2 to 7 Percent


WOMEN WITH EPILEPSY

MAJOR MALFORMATIONS 4 to 8 Percent
MINOR MALFORMATIONS 10 to 15 Percent
FETAL DEATH 2 to 14 Percent
_________________
Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rpwalavalkar
Teale Fenning Administrator


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 973

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

child of an epileptic ....


There is a higher risk for women with epilepsy to have children with the condition than for men with epilepsy. Seizure type and age of onset also affect incidence of epilepsy in the child.


The cumulative incidence of epilepsy to age 40 years is 3.6 percent in siblings and 10.6 percent in offspring of index case, compared with 1.7 percent in the general population.

Risk of epilepsy is not increased in more distant relatives e.g. nieces and nephews, grandchildren.

Risk in monozygotic twins is higher than in dizygotic twins.

Risks of epilepsy is approximately twice as high in offspring of affected women as in offspring of affected men.

reference ----

Ruth Ottman. Genetic Epidemiology of Epilepsy. Eptdemlologic Reviews. Copyright O 1997 by The Johns Hopkins Unlverstty School of Hygiene and PubBc Health. Vol. 19, No. 1.
_________________
Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1862
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Raj

Nice facts as always.

So I was right to say the risk was doubled. The chance of the fetus being affected or inheriting the disease is more if the mother is affected than the father and highest when both are affected. Not sure this rule applies to all diseases but I would use these relationships if unsure.

It is interesting in that they quote a major abnormality rate of 2-3% in the general population. Many people still quote 1% but I have been promoting 3% for a few years now.

I have to share my IVF experience with you...

The HFEA quote a 1% risk for background, 2% after IVF, and 3% afrter ICSI. These figures hold regardless even if the couple conceive spontaneously whislt waiting for treatment. The point is we tell couples IVF doubles the risk of abnormalities and ICSI triples it but that the risks relate more to the fact they need treatment than the treatment itself. I tell patients this but always end by saying some people quote a background risk of 3% anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rpwalavalkar
Teale Fenning Administrator


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 973

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smile

Thanks nick. i'm going to remember your 1%, 2%, 3% formula for the next time i talk IVF to a patient.

Smile
_________________
Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1862
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it is from the HFEA guide on ICSI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
EMAK
Century Club


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 572

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I should Thank you both Nick and Raji
many thanks.. Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TEALE FENNING Forum Index -> MRCOG Part 2: MCQ & Past Paper questions All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group