TEALE FENNING Forum Index TEALE FENNING
Medical Education
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Abortion act 1967

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TEALE FENNING Forum Index -> MRCOG Part 2: EMQs - Extended Matching Questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Xerxes I
Century Club


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 228
Location: Winchester

PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:41 am    Post subject: Abortion act 1967 Reply with quote

Regarding the abortion act 1967 and its ammendments, which clause (s) if any do these cases fall under:

A: Clause A
B: Clause B
C: clause C
D: Clause D
E: Clause E
F: Clause F
G: Clause G
H: Clauses A and E
I: Clauses A and D
J: Clauses E and D
K: Abortion act not relevant
L: Does not qualify under the abortion act


Question 1
36 weeker wants a termination for a unilateral isolated finding of talipes.

Question 2
37 weeker with Edwards syndrome baby on-board confirmed with invasive testing.

Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
salihabduallah
Century Club


Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 120

PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
drmmanish@yahoo.co.in



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 42
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

for q1 abortion act is not relevant and q2 E(permanent damage to child)
i have just checked the act.
_________________
manish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
drmmanish@yahoo.co.in



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 42
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Abortion Act 1967

The Abortion Act of 1967 came into effect on the 27 April 1968 and permits termination of pregnancy by a registered practitioner subject to certain conditions. Regulations under the Act mean that abortions must be performed by a registered medical practitioner in a National Health Service Hospital or in a Department of Health approved location - such as British Pregnancy Advisory Service Clinics. An abortion may be approved for the following reasons:

A The continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk to the life of the pregnant woman greater than if the pregnancy were terminated.

B The termination is necessary to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.

C The continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.

D The continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of any existing children of the family of the pregnant woman.

E There is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped, or in emergency, certified by the operating practitioners as immediately necessary-

F To save the life of the pregnant woman; or

G To prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.


Later in 1990 amendments to the 1967 Abortion Act came into force through the Human Fertilisation & Embryology Act.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (HFEA)

Section 37 of the HFEA later made changes to the 1967 Abortion Act in making the time limit of abortion 24 weeks under statutory grounds C and
D. Statutory grounds A, B and E are now without time limit.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recent Developments

In May 1996 'The Termination of Pregnancy Restriction Bill' was given its first reading in the House of Lords. The Bill, if passed, would have amended the Abortion Act of 1967 so that to perform terminations on the sole ground of a diagnosis of Downs Syndrome would become illegal. The Bill was introduced into the House of Lords by the Conservative Peer Viscount Brentford but a second reading was not requested and the bill never became law.

Although inconsistent and contradictory in its early legal development, the introduction of the Abortion Act of 1967 clarified the position on abortion and to this day provides the prominent statutory framework on which abortion is based.
_________________
manish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
docsubhi



Joined: 03 Sep 2007
Posts: 59
Location: london

PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

that's right but even after knowing I got the second one wrong - got confused between d and e !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maud



Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Posts: 73
Location: Bristol

PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

docsubhi wrote:
that's right but even after knowing I got the second one wrong - got confused between d and e !!!


me too Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rpwalavalkar
Teale Fenning Administrator


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 966

PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what did you answer Xerxes?

i agree with manish.

r
_________________
Dr Miss. Raj Walavalkar MBBS MRCOG
TealeFenning Administrator
SR O&G Wessex Region
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1854
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Abortion Act 1967

I wanted to try and simplify this so focus on the words in red and those underlined which change the importance:

A The continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk to the life of the pregnant woman greater than if the pregnancy were terminated.

B The termination is necessary to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.

C The continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.

D The continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of any existing children of the family of the pregnant woman.

E There is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped, or in emergency, certified by the operating practitioners as immediately necessary ...

F to save the life of the pregnant woman; or

G to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.


Not sure if that made it any easier but at least I tried!

Focus on the severity of the scenario and whose health is in danger.

Always found this difficult to do / consider.

N
_________________
"Teale Fenning Medical Education" delivering evidence-based, exam-orientated learning since 1997
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1854
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:56 am    Post subject: Re: Abortion act 1967 Reply with quote

Xerxes I wrote:
Question 1
36 weeker wants a termination for a unilateral isolated finding of talipes.


Shocked

So this is obviously ... K or L but which is the most correct?

Could it qualify under C???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1854
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Xerxes I wrote:
Question 2
37 weeker with Edwards syndrome baby on-board confirmed with invasive testing.


Easier ... E
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nick Raine-Fenning
Course Director


Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 1854
Location: Nottingham

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The debate Manish mentioned is very interesting and something i have questioned for years. Where do baby's with Down syndrome fit in?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TEALE FENNING Forum Index -> MRCOG Part 2: EMQs - Extended Matching Questions All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group